Home
Michigan
Battle Creek
...

Singles from Battle Creek

We investigated the distribution of the 5,180 singles from Battle Creek among the singles sites.

Who are you looking for in Battle Creek?

  1. Long Term or Short Term
    • Long Term:
      Dating and Matchmaking
    • Short Term:
      Casual Dates and Encounters
  2. Looking for males or females?
    • Females
    • Males
2,130 Females from Battle Creek 3,060 Males from Battle Creek

This is the males distribution:

This is the distribution of single women on dating sites on the internet:

This is the distribution of men that are willing to cheat on dating sites on the internet:

This is the distribution of women that are willing to cheat on dating sites on the internet:

eHarmony

eHarmony
620 Females 550 Males from Battle Creek
Test winner for freeIn-depth review

Ashley Madison

Ashley Madison
290 Females 680 Males from Battle Creek
Test winner for freeIn-depth review

Adultfriendfinder

Adultfriendfinder
590 Females 1,990 Males from Battle Creek
Test Adultfriendfinder for freeIn-depth review

Victoria Milan

Victoria Milan
10 Females 10 Males from Battle Creek
Test winner for freeIn-depth review

EliteSingles

EliteSingles
100 Females 100 Males from Battle Creek
Test EliteSingles for freeIn-depth review

Red Hot Pie

RedHotPie
30 Females 50 Males from Battle Creek
Test winner for freeIn-depth review

Match

Match
60 Females 100 Males from Battle Creek
In-depth review

Find singles from these areas too:

How do we get our data?

See more info on our calculation method

X

To determine how many singles can be found at the individual Dating-Services, we have calculated a complicated process associated with several assumptions.

In this calculation process values from statistics, population figures, membership of the respective Dating-Services and different mathematical distribution methods are discussed.

Please note: We expressly point out that our calculated results may differ from the actual display regional membership; this is not inconceivable. We have, as far as we are able, optimized the calculation method so that useful guidance values are calculated. Unfortunately, there can still be differences, we apologize for any inconvenience.