Home
Michigan
Grand Rapids
...

Singles from Grand Rapids

We investigated the distribution of the 19,200 singles from Grand Rapids among the singles sites.

Who are you looking for on Grand Rapids?

  1. Long Term or Short Term
    • Long Term:
      Dating and Matchmaking
    • Short Term:
      Casual Dates and Encounters
  2. Looking for males or females?
    • Females
    • Males
7,890 Females from Grand Rapids 11,400 Males from Grand Rapids

This is the males distribution:

This is the distribution of single women on dating sites on the internet:

This is the distribution of men that are willing to cheat on dating sites on the internet:

This is the distribution of women that are willing to cheat on dating sites on the internet:

eHarmony

eHarmony
2,300 Females 2,040 Males from Grand Rapids
Test winner for freeIn-depth review

Ashley Madison

Ashley Madison
1,080 Females 2,510 Males from Grand Rapids
Test winner for freeIn-depth review

Adultfriendfinder

Adultfriendfinder
2,200 Females 7,370 Males from Grand Rapids
Test Adultfriendfinder for freeIn-depth review

Red Hot Pie

Red Hot Pie
120 Females 180 Males from Grand Rapids
Test Red Hot Pie for freeIn-depth review

Victoria Milan

Victoria Milan
30 Females 50 Males from Grand Rapids
Test winner for freeIn-depth review

EliteSingles

EliteSingles
370 Females 370 Males from Grand Rapids
Test EliteSingles for freeIn-depth review

Match

Match
240 Females 360 Males from Grand Rapids
In-depth review

Find singles from these areas too:

How do we get our data?

See more info on our calculation method

X

To determine how many singles can be found at about the individual Dating-Services, we have calculated a complicated process associated with several assumptions.

In this calculation process values from statistics, population figures, membership of the respective Dating-Services and different mathematical distribution methods are discussed.

Please note: We expressly point out that our calculated results may differ from the actual display regional membership; this is not inconceivable. We have, as far as we are able, the calculation method optimized so that useful guidance values are calculated. Unfortunately, there can still be differences, we apologize for any inconvenience.