Home
Connecticut
Singles from
...

Singles from Connecticut

We investigated the distribution of the 146,400 singles from Connecticut among the singles sites.

Who are you looking for in Connecticut?

  1. Long Term or Short Term
    • Long Term:
      Dating and Matchmaking
    • Short Term:
      Casual Dates and Encounters
  2. Looking for males or females?
    • Females
    • Males
60,000 Females from Connecticut 86,400 Males from Connecticut

This is the males distribution:

This is the distribution of single women on dating sites on the internet:

This is the distribution of men that are willing to cheat on dating sites on the internet:

This is the distribution of women that are willing to cheat on dating sites on the internet:

eHarmony

eHarmony
17,500 Females 15,520 Males from Connecticut
Test winner for freeIn-depth review

Ashley Madison

Ashley Madison
8,200 Females 19,130 Males from Connecticut
Test winner for freeIn-depth review

Adultfriendfinder

Adultfriendfinder
16,760 Females 56,110 Males from Connecticut
Test Adultfriendfinder for freeIn-depth review

Red Hot Pie

RedHotPie
910 Females 1,370 Males from Connecticut
Test RedHotPie for freeIn-depth review

Victoria Milan

Victoria Milan
260 Females 400 Males from Connecticut
Test winner for freeIn-depth review

EliteSingles

EliteSingles
2,850 Females 2,850 Males from Connecticut
Test EliteSingles for freeIn-depth review

Match

Match
1,820 Females 2,730 Males from Connecticut
In-depth review

Find singles from these areas too:

How do we get our data?

See more info on our calculation method

X

To determine how many singles can be found at about the individual Dating-Services, we have calculated a complicated process associated with several assumptions.

In this calculation process values from statistics, population figures, membership of the respective Dating-Services and different mathematical distribution methods are discussed.

Please note: We expressly point out that our calculated results may differ from the actual display regional membership; this is not inconceivable. We have, as far as we are able, the calculation method optimized so that useful guidance values are calculated. Unfortunately, there can still be differences, we apologize for any inconvenience.