Home
California
Diamond Bar
...

Singles from Diamond Bar

We investigated the distribution of the 5,650 singles from Diamond Bar among the singles sites.

Who are you looking for in Diamond Bar?

  1. Long Term or Short Term
    • Long Term:
      Dating and Matchmaking
    • Short Term:
      Casual Dates and Encounters
  2. Looking for males or females?
    • Females
    • Males
2,320 Females from Diamond Bar 3,330 Males from Diamond Bar

This is the males distribution:

This is the distribution of single women on dating sites on the internet:

This is the distribution of men that are willing to cheat on dating sites on the internet:

This is the distribution of women that are willing to cheat on dating sites on the internet:

eHarmony

eHarmony
680 Females 600 Males from Diamond Bar
Test winner for freeIn-depth review

Ashley Madison

Ashley Madison
320 Females 740 Males from Diamond Bar
Test winner for freeIn-depth review

Adultfriendfinder

Adultfriendfinder
650 Females 2,160 Males from Diamond Bar
Test Adultfriendfinder for freeIn-depth review

Red Hot Pie

RedHotPie
40 Females 50 Males from Diamond Bar
Test RedHotPie for freeIn-depth review

Victoria Milan

Victoria Milan
10 Females 20 Males from Diamond Bar
Test winner for freeIn-depth review

EliteSingles

EliteSingles
110 Females 110 Males from Diamond Bar
Test EliteSingles for freeIn-depth review

Match

Match
70 Females 110 Males from Diamond Bar
In-depth review

Find singles from these areas too:

How do we get our data?

See more info on our calculation method

X

To determine how many singles can be found at about the individual Dating-Services, we have calculated a complicated process associated with several assumptions.

In this calculation process values from statistics, population figures, membership of the respective Dating-Services and different mathematical distribution methods are discussed.

Please note: We expressly point out that our calculated results may differ from the actual display regional membership; this is not inconceivable. We have, as far as we are able, the calculation method optimized so that useful guidance values are calculated. Unfortunately, there can still be differences, we apologize for any inconvenience.