Home
California
Fontana
...

Singles from Fontana

We investigated the distribution of the 20,400 singles from Fontana among the single sites.

Who are you looking for in Fontana?

  1. Long Term or Short Term
    • Long Term:
      Dating and Matchmaking
    • Short Term:
      Casual Dates and Encounters
  2. Looking for males or females?
    • Females
    • Males
8,350 Females from Fontana 12,000 Males from Fontana

This is the males distribution:

This is the distribution of single women on dating sites on the internet:

This is the distribution of men that are willing to cheat on dating sites on the internet:

This is the distribution of women that are willing to cheat on dating sites on the internet:

C-date

C-date
170 Females 150 Males from Fontana
In-depth review

Ashley Madison

Ashley Madison
1,580 Females 2,270 Males from Fontana
Test winner for freeIn-depth review

Zoosk

Zoosk
1,440 Females 1,760 Males from Fontana
In-depth review

Red Hot Pie

Red Hot Pie
120 Females 200 Males from Fontana
Test Red Hot Pie for freeIn-depth review

eHarmony

eHarmony
80 Females 80 Males from Fontana
In-depth review

Plenty of Fish

Plenty of Fish
5,000 Females 7,510 Males from Fontana
In-depth review

Do you have any tips about dating in Fontana?

Great! Share your tip and we will publish it here to help other singles in your area.
Please choose a location from the list.

Thank you for this suggestion, we will publish it soon.

Find singles from these areas too:

How do we get our data?

See more info on our calculation method

X

To determine how many singles can be found at about the individual Dating-Services, we have calculated a complicated process associated with several assumptions.

In this calculation process values from statistics, population figures, membership of the respective Dating-Services and different mathematical distribution methods are discussed.

Please note: We expressly point out that our calculated results may differ from the actual display regional membership; this is not inconceivable. We have, as far as we are able, the calculation method optimized so that useful guidance values are calculated. Unfortunately, there can still be differences, we apologize for any inconvenience.