Home
California
East Los Angeles
...

Singles from East Los Angeles

We investigated the distribution of the 12,500 singles from East Los Angeles among the single sites.

Who are you looking for in East Los Angeles?

  1. Long Term or Short Term
    • Long Term:
      Dating and Matchmaking
    • Short Term:
      Casual Dates and Encounters
  2. Looking for males or females?
    • Females
    • Males
5,140 Females from East Los Angeles 7,400 Males from East Los Angeles

This is the males distribution:

This is the distribution of single women on dating sites on the internet:

This is the distribution of men that are willing to cheat on dating sites on the internet:

This is the distribution of women that are willing to cheat on dating sites on the internet:

Zoosk

Zoosk
1,500 Females 1,840 Males from East Los Angeles
In-depth review

Red Hot Pie

Red Hot Pie
1,440 Females 1,910 Males from East Los Angeles
Test winner for freeIn-depth review

C-date

C-date
1,340 Females 2,010 Males from East Los Angeles
In-depth review

eHarmony

eHarmony
840 Females 840 Males from East Los Angeles
In-depth review

Plenty of Fish

Plenty of Fish
400 Females 430 Males from East Los Angeles
In-depth review

Do you have any tips about dating in East Los Angeles?

Great! Share your tip and we will publish it here to help other singles in your area.
Please choose a location from the list.

Thank you for this suggestion, we will publish it soon.

Find singles from these areas too:

How do we get our data?

See more info on our calculation method

X

To determine how many singles can be found at about the individual Dating-Services, we have calculated a complicated process associated with several assumptions.

In this calculation process values from statistics, population figures, membership of the respective Dating-Services and different mathematical distribution methods are discussed.

Please note: We expressly point out that our calculated results may differ from the actual display regional membership; this is not inconceivable. We have, as far as we are able, the calculation method optimized so that useful guidance values are calculated. Unfortunately, there can still be differences, we apologize for any inconvenience.