Home
New Jersey
Jersey City
...

Singles from Jersey City

We investigated the distribution of the 26,000 singles from Jersey City among the singles sites.

Who are you looking for on Jersey City?

  1. Long Term or Short Term
    • Long Term:
      Dating and Matchmaking
    • Short Term:
      Casual Dates and Encounters
  2. Looking for males or females?
    • Females
    • Males
10,700 Females from Jersey City 15,300 Males from Jersey City

This is the males distribution:

This is the distribution of single women on dating sites on the internet:

This is the distribution of men that are willing to cheat on dating sites on the internet:

This is the distribution of women that are willing to cheat on dating sites on the internet:

eHarmony

eHarmony
3,100 Females 2,750 Males from Jersey City
Test winner for freeIn-depth review

Ashley Madison

Ashley Madison
1,450 Females 3,390 Males from Jersey City
Test winner for freeIn-depth review

Adultfriendfinder

Adultfriendfinder
2,970 Females 9,950 Males from Jersey City
Test Adultfriendfinder for freeIn-depth review

Red Hot Pie

RedHotPie
160 Females 240 Males from Jersey City
Test RedHotPie for freeIn-depth review

Victoria Milan

Victoria Milan
50 Females 70 Males from Jersey City
Test winner for freeIn-depth review

EliteSingles

EliteSingles
510 Females 510 Males from Jersey City
Test EliteSingles for freeIn-depth review

Match

Match
320 Females 480 Males from Jersey City
In-depth review

Find singles from these areas too:

How do we get our data?

See more info on our calculation method

X

To determine how many singles can be found at about the individual Dating-Services, we have calculated a complicated process associated with several assumptions.

In this calculation process values from statistics, population figures, membership of the respective Dating-Services and different mathematical distribution methods are discussed.

Please note: We expressly point out that our calculated results may differ from the actual display regional membership; this is not inconceivable. We have, as far as we are able, the calculation method optimized so that useful guidance values are calculated. Unfortunately, there can still be differences, we apologize for any inconvenience.