Home
Michigan
Dearborn Heights
...

Singles from Dearborn Heights

We investigated the distribution of the 5,670 singles from Dearborn Heights among the single sites.

Who are you looking for in Dearborn Heights?

  1. Long Term or Short Term
    • Long Term:
      Dating and Matchmaking
    • Short Term:
      Casual Dates and Encounters
  2. Looking for males or females?
    • Females
    • Males
2,320 Females from Dearborn Heights 3,340 Males from Dearborn Heights

This is the males distribution:

This is the distribution of single women on dating sites on the internet:

This is the distribution of men that are willing to cheat on dating sites on the internet:

This is the distribution of women that are willing to cheat on dating sites on the internet:

eHarmony

eHarmony
590 Females 660 Males from Dearborn Heights
Test winner for freeIn-depth review

Zoosk

Zoosk
390 Females 480 Males from Dearborn Heights
Test winner for freeIn-depth review

Red Hot Pie

Red Hot Pie
30 Females 50 Males from Dearborn Heights
Test Red Hot Pie for freeIn-depth review

Plenty of Fish

Plenty of Fish
1,350 Females 2,020 Males from Dearborn Heights
In-depth review

C-date

C-date
40 Females 40 Males from Dearborn Heights
In-depth review

Do you have any tips about dating in Dearborn Heights?

Great! Share your tip and we will publish it here to help other singles in your area.
Please choose a location from the list.

Thank you for this suggestion, we will publish it soon.

Find singles from these areas too:

How do we get our data?

See more info on our calculation method

X

To determine how many singles can be found at about the individual Dating-Services, we have calculated a complicated process associated with several assumptions.

In this calculation process values from statistics, population figures, membership of the respective Dating-Services and different mathematical distribution methods are discussed.

Please note: We expressly point out that our calculated results may differ from the actual display regional membership; this is not inconceivable. We have, as far as we are able, the calculation method optimized so that useful guidance values are calculated. Unfortunately, there can still be differences, we apologize for any inconvenience.