Home
California
Clovis
...

Singles from Clovis

We investigated the distribution of the 10,000 singles from Clovis among the single sites.

Who are you looking for in Clovis?

  1. Long Term or Short Term
    • Long Term:
      Dating and Matchmaking
    • Short Term:
      Casual Dates and Encounters
  2. Looking for males or females?
    • Females
    • Males
4,120 Females from Clovis 5,930 Males from Clovis

This is the males distribution:

This is the distribution of single women on dating sites on the internet:

This is the distribution of men that are willing to cheat on dating sites on the internet:

This is the distribution of women that are willing to cheat on dating sites on the internet:

eHarmony

eharmonyu`
880 Females 1,000 Males from Clovis
Test winner for freeIn-depth review

C-date

c-date Logou`
70 Females 60 Males from Clovis
In-depth review

Ashley Madison

Ashley Madison Affair Dating Site Logou`
640 Females 920 Males from Clovis
Test winner for freeIn-depth review

Zoosk

Zoosk logou`
580 Females 710 Males from Clovis
In-depth review

Red Hot Pie

Logou`
50 Females 80 Males from Clovis
Test Red Hot Pie for freeIn-depth review

Plenty of Fish

POF-Logou`
2,020 Females 3,030 Males from Clovis
In-depth review

Do you have any tips about dating in Clovis?

Great! Share your tip and we will publish it here to help other singles in your area.
Please choose a location from the list.

Thank you for this suggestion, we will publish it soon.

Find singles from these areas too:

How do we get our data?

See more info on our calculation method

X

To determine how many singles can be found at about the individual Dating-Services, we have calculated a complicated process associated with several assumptions.

In this calculation process values from statistics, population figures, membership of the respective Dating-Services and different mathematical distribution methods are discussed.

Please note: We expressly point out that our calculated results may differ from the actual display regional membership; this is not inconceivable. We have, as far as we are able, the calculation method optimized so that useful guidance values are calculated. Unfortunately, there can still be differences, we apologize for any inconvenience.