Home
Nevada
Singles from
...

Singles from Nevada

We investigated the distribution of the 234,500 singles from Nevada among the single sites.

Who are you looking for in Nevada?

  1. Long Term or Short Term
    • Long Term:
      Dating and Matchmaking
    • Short Term:
      Casual Dates and Encounters
  2. Looking for males or females?
    • Females
    • Males
96,200 Females from Nevada 138,400 Males from Nevada

This is the males distribution:

This is the distribution of single women on dating sites on the internet:

This is the distribution of men that are willing to cheat on dating sites on the internet:

This is the distribution of women that are willing to cheat on dating sites on the internet:

eHarmony

eHarmony
20,620 Females 23,250 Males from Nevada
Test winner for freeIn-depth review

Ashley Madison

Ashley Madison
14,890 Females 21,420 Males from Nevada
Test winner for freeIn-depth review

Zoosk

Zoosk
13,620 Females 16,640 Males from Nevada
In-depth review

Red Hot Pie

Red Hot Pie
1,120 Females 1,910 Males from Nevada
Test Red Hot Pie for freeIn-depth review

Plenty of Fish

Plenty of Fish
47,200 Females 70,810 Males from Nevada
In-depth review

C-date

C-date
1,570 Females 1,450 Males from Nevada
In-depth review

Do you have any tips about dating in Nevada?

Great! Share your tip and we will publish it here to help other singles in your area.
Please choose a location from the list.

Thank you for this suggestion, we will publish it soon.

Find singles from these areas too:

How do we get our data?

See more info on our calculation method

X

To determine how many singles can be found at about the individual Dating-Services, we have calculated a complicated process associated with several assumptions.

In this calculation process values from statistics, population figures, membership of the respective Dating-Services and different mathematical distribution methods are discussed.

Please note: We expressly point out that our calculated results may differ from the actual display regional membership; this is not inconceivable. We have, as far as we are able, the calculation method optimized so that useful guidance values are calculated. Unfortunately, there can still be differences, we apologize for any inconvenience.